Guide for Editors

Ensuring Quality and Integrity in Mechanical Engineering Research

Initial Review

The initial review is the first step taken by the editor to ensure that the submitted article meets the quality standards of ROTOR: Jurnal Ilmiah Teknik Mesin. The editor should:

• Check the article’s relevance to the journal’s scope in mechanical engineering.

• Ensure that it includes a complete abstract, keywords, and references.

• Verify that the article is free from plagiarism, excessive use of generative AI, and other errors that may affect its quality.

If the article does not meet these standards, the editor may reject it or request revisions before proceeding to the peer-review process.

Reviewer Selection

Selecting the right reviewer is a critical step in the editorial process. The editor should:

• Choose reviewers who are competent and knowledgeable in the manuscript’s specific field of mechanical engineering.

• Ensure reviewers can provide constructive and specific comments.

• Confirm that reviewers have no conflict of interest with the author, so the review process remains objective and fair.

Reviewers may be selected from the journal’s registered reviewer list or identified externally based on expertise. Clear instructions should always be provided to reviewers regarding the review process.

Review Process

The review process is central to maintaining scholarly quality. The editor should:

• Ensure that reviews are conducted objectively and fairly.

• Allow reviewers sufficient time to complete their evaluation, typically 2–4 weeks.

• Confirm that reviewers provide specific, constructive comments to help authors improve their manuscripts.

Editorial Decision

The editorial decision is based on the reviewer’s feedback and the article’s overall quality and relevance. Possible decisions include:

• Accept

• Minor Revision

• Major Revision

• Reject

The editor should provide clear, constructive feedback to authors, ensuring decisions are made objectively and fairly.

Communication with Authors

Effective communication with authors is essential. The editor should:

• Clearly explain the editorial decision and the required revisions.

• Provide guidance on the next steps in the publication process.

• Offer constructive and specific feedback to help authors improve their work.

• Maintain fairness and professionalism in all communications.